Monday 21 July 2014

We Are The Professionals

“I'm trying my heart out to do this
“I've got to start scoring runs as well, that can only happen with a lot of hard work.
“he's desperate to keep on playing and wants to turn this around.
“he's a fighter and we want people like that in the dressing room."
“I'm desperate to turn things around for England.
“He knows he has been under pressure for a long time
“He knows it is tough up here
“He is up for the challenge
“There's a group of players in there who are desperate to win for England.
“It will take a lot of determination to turn this around.
“International cricket is about tough decisions”
“It is meant to be a tough environment
“I knew it was going to be tough


Above are a few of the quotes from Alistair Cook and Peter Moores after defeat in the 2nd Test to India. They betray the mindset of this current England side, and it can be argued, the English cricket mindset as a whole. The running theme is clear – it’s about pressure, it’s about fight, it’s about working harder.

To hear these comments come from a sports team is no surprise, and in fact is probably what you would hear from most sports teams. But this mistakes sport for a matter of life and death – the mindset is militaristic, demanding perfect discipline from the troops. The pressure is talked about and amplified, used as a further incentive to be disciplined. The demand for extra effort is incessant, the mantra to live by. It is about winning and losing, life and death.

Sport though is not a matter of life and death, yet part of the entertainment business. You do not hear actors talking about how desperate they are to perform well, musicians talking about fighting hard for their next album, authors talking about the tough environment that being an author is. If they did, it would be pointed out as the utter bollocks that it is. Being an entertainer, which sportsmen and women are, is not about discipline but expression – technical skills are simply a tool, not the end objective.

This mindset is seen in a number of sports and almost for a generation but it’s only now becoming obvious how detrimental this can be.

When England arrived in Australia we were told how hard they had worked, how fit they were – we are often told that this is the fittest and most professional cricket side ever. Fitness is important for cricket but not the most important aspect. It’s like being the snooker player with the most cue power – it’s useful, but nowhere near as important as hitting the ball where you want it to go.

The obsession with professionalism is even more damaging. England are a very professional cricket side – their players turn up on time, they train long hours, they wear the right clothes, they say the right things, they know all of the plans, they eat the right things and they behave in the right way. This is all well and good when the environment is under your complete control. The moment something unexpected happens there is simply no-one with the problem solving ability to come up with a solution. The plan is blindly followed when it works, and when it doesn’t, it’s followed anyway so that at the end of the game the plan can be changed slightly and if we lose, well, at least we had a plan. The plan by its very nature is highly conventional and cannot take into account the various complex factors that make up a game of cricket. That’s not to say a plan isn’t important – it is, but it should be like a movie script without dialogue, a general set of ideas where the players fill in the blanks.



When the plan doesn’t work, either for the team or player, the world becomes a very lonely place. The players will struggle, but far more fundamentally, they don’t understand why they are struggling and sure as hell don’t have any idea how to stop struggling. This England side is struggling badly, and until they appreciate that sport is not a war to be won, but a piece of entertainment to be enjoyed, and that blindly following over-prescriptive plans to get them out of problems that these plans helped create in the first place is self-defeating, then they will continue to play joyless, losing cricket.

Wednesday 9 July 2014

England's Top 25 Cricketers After Sri Lanka




After England’s disappointing treble defeat to Sri Lanka, here’s the top 25:-

On the bubble – Adam Riley (with every wicket he takes he looks more like the Ashes 2015 spinner), Scott Borthwick (needed wickets, got runs), James Harris (swings the ball but needs a fitness run), Graham Onions (injured, and that could be that for him), Monty Panesar (the best spinner in England needs to behave himself), James Taylor (Seems destined to be solid eighth choice), Jonny Bairstow (getting the run of keeping opportunities he needs), Nick Compton (still there abouts but needs the spectacular)

25 (20) – Simon Kerrigan

He would have been hugely disappointed not to get the nod for the Test side, and it was a bit of a kick in the teeth for all the spinners to see an all-rounder chosen as the Test spinner. His bowling has been solid for Lancashire in unhelpful conditions, and he has a working relationship with Peter Moores. It seems Ali will be entrenched for the rest of the summer, and as Kerrigan doesn’t play white ball cricket for Lancashire, he doesn’t have a route into the ODI side. England tour the West Indies in April after the World Cup, and they will need a spinner there. Kerrigan needs to keep himself ahead of Adam Riley the rest of the summer.

24 (RE) – Michael Carberry

In some cases criticising the England management has proved terminal, so when Michael Carberry opened up on his perceived poor treatment during the winter, it was assumed his international career was over. However, he got another chance in the white ball sides, but failed to impress in both innings. With Sam Robson making a Test hundred, and Darryl Mitchell having exploded, it’s hard to see Carberry making the Test side, but with Cook in horrible form, and under heavy criticism, a World Cup spot is probable, and a starting spot possible.

23 (NE) – James Vince

http://cricketbadger.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Vince-Whites-Bat-Leicestershire-AgeasBowl-NJM-2-720x400.jpg.pagespeed.ce.gU4HSWPay2.jpg

A player marked out from an early age for England honours, Vince has always benefitted from the “Bell effect”, where a player’s ability is over-estimated due to the quality of their stroke play. With Vince in 2014, the occasional glorious innings and large number of cameos has become a tidal wave of runs, and he is the top run scorer in England and the first to 1,000 runs. Added to that a captaincy role which he has taken to well, and a high strike rate, and it seems a case of when and not if for Vince with international honours.

22 (RE) – Samit Patel

Vince is the top run scorer in the country, and Samit is second. 20 innings, 2 hundred, 6 fifties and 4 ducks tell a story of inconsistency, but Patel has done the business for Nottinghamshire, and has done it in Division 1. His bowling has plateaued slightly, and whilst he is accurate he doesn’t offer much of a wicket taking threat. He spent the Sri Lanka series on the outside looking in, but must have pushed Ali close for the role in the Test team, and is another player with the game to push for a spot in all three sides.

21 (NE) – Harry Gurney

A slightly uninspiring selection, Gurney made the most of his opportunity and bowled strongly against Sri Lanka, whilst also maintaining his form for Nottinghamshire. Gurney is not particularly quick, and doesn’t offer a huge deal of movement, but he bowled accurately and to his field, and his slower ball caused Sri Lanka problems. The key for Gurney is that slower ball stays a mystery until the World Cup, because if players work it out he could be fodder in Australia. He deserves to be in and around the ODI squad for the future and his World Cup chances are good.

20 (25) – James Tredwell

If England don’t like the look of any of the young spinners, and Moeen Ali doesn’t work out, could James Tredwell receive a second Test cap? He bowled extremely well during the ODI series, and is currently in the envious position of being the only full-time spinner that England are selecting. His major problem is that Riley has pushed ahead of him at Kent, giving a nudge to the England selectors.

19 (21) – Alex Hales

It was all beginning to look a bit grim for Hales before the t20 match against Sri Lanka, as England didn’t seem to fancy him for ODIs, and Nottinghamshire seemed to be losing patience. 66 that day highlighted his ability, and Cook and Carberry’s subsequent struggles in the ODI series pushed for involvement in that side. Since, he’s returned to Nottinghamshire with a big hundred and two nineties (Hales is a real nervous nineties merchant) and everything is looking rosy again. The World Cup might come too soon but if Cook’s and England’s ODI form continues there will be a vacancy at the top of the order at the end of that tournament.

18 (17) – Tim Bresnan

Bresnan was finally dropped from all formats for the Sri Lanka series, but with Chris Woakes only playing one game and Plunkett only the Tests, he’s still in with a strong shout with his multi-format game. Has a huge advantage as he goes back to play for the best side in county cricket, so his wickets and runs are likely to contribute to a successful Division 1 side, which always counts for that little bit extra. Might not feature this summer but a winter tour spot is certainly achievable.

17 (15) – Chris Woakes

Only played in the t20 despite being in all three squads, it was hard to get a feel for where Woakes is an international level. Pleasingly he touched the high 80s with his speed, which suggests that the loss of speed that hurt him chances so greatly might be gone. To get into the side, Woakes needs to find the excellent batting form from the previous two years that has deserted him in 2014.

16 (8) – Steven Finn

When I last wrote about Finn he was the top wicket-taker in the country, whilst England had the untested Chris Jordan and the cheap imitation Liam Plunkett. The past eight weeks couldn’t have gone much worse for Finn – he’s been injured and struggled when selected, Jordan has nailed down his ODI spot and Plunkett his Test spot. It is a fairly obvious statement, but I am going to say it anyway – he needs to get fit, take wickets for Middlesex again and show he possesses everything that Plunkett does.

15 (NE) – Liam Plunkett

http://e0.365dm.com/13/08/768x432/liam-plunkett-lions-v-australia_2988531.jpg?20130817145844

England’s phoenix from the flames, Plunkett bowled quickly with Lords without actually delivering much, before nine wickets at Headingley backed the selector’s faith. This was a win for the England Lions, for whom Plunkett was superb on the tour of Sri Lanka during the winter, a win for the selectors who choose to take a 28 year-old on that tour, and a huge win to the fast growing reputation, utterly deserved, of Jason Gillespie. England may be forced to choose between Chris Jordan and Plunkett for the first Test against India, and at the moment it should be Plunkett who plays.

14 (11) – Ravi Bopara

A good fifty at Lords aside and a t20 cameo aside, Bopara was a disappointment against Sri Lanka. His bowling, so effective over the winter in positions of weakness, was completely ineffectual when he often found himself bowling in a position of strength. That said, Bopara has, and deserves, credit in the bank for his performances over the winter and in white ball cricket for Essex seems unstoppable.

13 (14) – Chris Jordan

Superb in the ODI series, Jordan bought some real aggression and pace, along with a slightly wonky radar. His Test performances could be summed up as acceptable, although Plunkett’s emergence overshadowed him. His performances in the ODIs, given the World Cup is in Australia, makes him a certain squad member there and in truth only Anderson among the bowlers should start ahead of him.

12 (12) – Eoin Morgan

Last time I wrote about Morgan he had been superb for England and a disappointment for Middlesex. This time, Morgan was disappointing during the white ball cricket for England, but has delivered for Middlesex, with a blistering 191 against a very good Nottinghamshire attack. I might have pushed him down the list further, had it not been for Cook’s continuing struggles, and Morgan’s own pleasing captaincy for Middlesex. It would be a big surprise for him not to be confirmed as full-time t20 captain at the end of the summer.

11 (13) – Sam Robson

A very good hundred, and three failures. Sam Robson managed in his second Test to do what Alistair Cook hasn’t done for 12 and make a Test hundred, although Cook’s struggles and Robson’s low scores in the other innings mean England still haven’t had an opening partnership of note for well over a year. Until a pair settles down and starts making regular fifty partnerships, and whilst Cook remains captain and out of form, there is going to be pressure on the second opening spot and Robson is currently in the hot seat.

10 (19) – Moeen Ali

http://uwpics.urduwire.com/images_photos/photos/Moeen-Ali46513513_2014624215046.jpg

Sometimes necessity is the mother of invention, and that was certainly the case for Moeen Ali at Headingley. Three awful shots in the first three innings of his Test career, his spin bowling good but not making a case for a full time role, Ali was under big pressure but produced an innings of real substance. It gets quite irksome to hear professional commentators marvelling at the attractiveness of Ali’s stroke play – it’s no secret on the county scene – but innings of substance have occasionally been lacking, and here Ali delivered.

His bowling and hundred leave England with a big problem. His bowling is good but not good enough to be the full time spinner. The simple call before the final innings at Headingley was to drop Ali for Stokes, and Jordan for a full-time spinner, for the first Test against India - now that’s all up in the air. Ali’s performances should mean however that he gets a chance in the ODIs later in the summer, as an alternative to Tredwell this winter could be playing Ali at three, and using him and Root as the spinning options.

9 (7) – Ben Stokes

England’s new dawn got off to a staggeringly hypocritical start when Stokes wasn’t selected for the Test series against Sri Lanka, having played two First Class games for Durham, whilst Matt Prior was selected having only played once for Sussex. It gives rise to the feeling that for all his talent, England don’t really fancy Stokes as an individual, which is extremely concerning. He does have black marks against his name, but he also has a rare talent. For Durham, the batting hasn’t really fired, but the bowling has, with great comic timing – as England laboured on the 4th day at Headingley, Stokes took seven wickets for Durham.

8 (10) – Jos Buttler

If you are looking to get your name up in lights, then a chanceless, brilliant, near match winning hundred at Lords is probably the best way to do it. As England’s top order poked and prodded England to defeat, Buttler boomed and blasted his way to a superb 121, an innings described by some as England’s best ever ODI innings. His wicket-keeping was at best average, and was seen as the main reason for his non selection from the Test team. After Prior’s performance behind the stumps against Sri Lanka and more runs for Lancashire, Buttler is knocking on the door.

7 (9) – Gary Ballance

It was perhaps a surprise to see the best number five in the County Championship batting three for England, but maybe only Liam Plunkett comes out of the Test series with as much credit as Ballance. After a middling ODI series, Ballance produced a hundred of real quality (whether England should have let him get it is not a question for him), and backed it up in the 2nd Test. His fielding could do with a little bit of refinement but he’s in the England team for the long haul.

6 (5) – Matt Prior

If Peter Moores was hoping for the Matt Prior of 2011 and hoping not for the Matt Prior of 2013, he got neither – he got the Matt Prior of 2007. Flashy, and perhaps lucky to get the runs he did (the review system played into his hands), Prior produced the runs of a front line batsman. The problem was his keeping, which was decidedly dodgy. Prior was bought back to provide Cook with support, but that is reaching a lost cause now. It’s hard not to get the feeling that Prior is on the downward slope whilst Buttler’s star rises.

5 (6) – Joe Root

Having avoided the World t20 disaster with his broken thumb, Root had a very similar series to Ballance. A very middling ODI series was followed by an excellent double hundred, then nothing else. Root has a lot of credit in the bank, and rightly so, but are England going to continue to flog him to death by picking him for every game in every format?

4 (4) – Stuart Broad

It’s hard to avoid the obvious conclusion that England need to stop mucking about with Broad and send him for the knee surgery he admits he needs. England needed the spectacular from Broad and got average, bar a hat-trick, but with a World Cup around the corner, it seems foolish for England to force Broad through a Tests with bits floating around in his knee, giving the long term problems suffered by both Graeme Swann and Kevin Pietersen.

3 (2) – Ian Bell

This series was Ian Bell at his very worst. Looked in dazzling touch from the first ODI, Bell produced several fantastic shots, and not a single innings of note. As Ballance, Robson, Root and Ali showed, England do not need the pretty at the minute, but the runs, particularly in ODI cricket where given Cook’s form and Ballance’s inexperience, Bell might just be England’s most important batter. Last summer’s Ashes mean Bell is well in credit, and he destroyed India last time around – England may well need that again.

2 (3) – James Anderson

Subdued during the Ashes, quite possibly due to the broken rib he suffered at the hands of Mitchell Johnson, Anderson was back to somewhere close to his best against Sri Lanka. Almost forced an unlikely win in the 1st Test, and an unlikely draw in the 2nd, Anderson re-iterated his importance to this England attack in home conditions. Also gets bonus points for the funky field setting that perhaps led to Sangakarra’s dismissal in the 1st Test.

1 (1) – Alistair Cook

This was supposed to be the series where everything got back on track for Alistair Cook, where demons could be laid to rest, runs could be scored and wins could be had. At the end of the series, all of the troubles that were there before are still not only present but magnified. This was not Australia, with bowlers like Harris and Johnson and batters like Clarke and Warner. This was Sri Lanka in England in June, and England and Cook couldn’t get the job done.

The excuses are running out. Critics of Cook’s captaincy have been told to just look at his results, and then we started losing. We were told he was good off the pitch, and then things got so bad the ECB sacked Kevin Pietersen. We were told it was Andy Flower creating the negative mindset, and then we started giving the mighty Angelo Mathews one against the new ball. We were told Cook would do his talking not with his tactics, but his runs, and it’s now 12 months without a Test hundred.

Why is he still number 1? That’s because the ECB have backed him for the long term, and he is refusing to resign. English cricket’s success remains inexorably linked to Cook, he is the basket that the ECB have placed all their eggs in, and several reputations are based on his appointment and success as a captain. This really is make or break for Cook – England can win this series and he can score runs against this Indian attack, giving him momentum before the World Cup. If England lose, and Cook fails to deliver with the bat, it’s hard to see how his position would not be untenable.