World T20 - The Main Tournament

After the Associate starter, here comes the main course

Group A

Winners – New Zealand

I will start off by saying that this is not the strongest group, although it gets the X-Factor of Ireland, a team capable of beating all four sides. New Zealand cricket is on a bit of an upswing after beating India, thanks to two immense performances from Brendon McCullum. Spin bowling is an issue, in fact a big issue, but so is it for everyone else in this group. With the exception of Kane Williamson, New Zealand have a power packed line-up, featuring McCullum, Ross Taylor, Martin Guptill and Corey Anderson, and a couple of their bowlers hit long as well. They won’t win all four games, but they will thrash someone (England?) and that will be enough for them to top the group.

One to watch – Tim Southee

Lots of people will be pointing to McCullum after his exploits against India, but he has struggled in t20 on subcontinent pitches, his explosion in game 1 of the IPL aside. Corey Anderson offers a lot in he can bowl, he can field, and he can hit it miles, but he is completely unproven in Asia. The man who will have a huge say in New Zealand’s performances is Tim Southee, who will bowl in the power play and at the death. Southee is not quick, but bowls an excellent yorker, and he’ll bowl the big overs for the Black Caps. The big problem for Southee is if he gets it wrong, its 80mph and it’s in the slot – in tight games, Southee will be the winner or loser for New Zealand.

2^nd – Sri Lanka

Straight off the bat they have an unknown quantity as captain in Dinesh Chandimal, which given that the triumvirate of Jayawardene, Sangakarra and Dilshan seem to have been rotating the captaincy for the past thirty years, is a worry for them. However, on field captaincy under pressure can be fairly easy for Chandimal – he can just ask Lasith Malinga to bowl a yorker, which Malinga will inevitably produce. This is the standard Sri Lanka World Cup team, don’t look world beaters or paper, but don’t have any obvious weaknesses either. They’ll also follow the standard Sri Lanka World Cup formula of beating all the teams they should before losing to someone better in the knockout stages.

One to watch – Lasith Malinga

To a lot of people, when you say T20 cricket, they think of big hits, Chris Gayle smoking the ball out of the ground, AB de Villiers reverse scooping, Kieron Pollard plucking balls out of the sky. To me, when I hear T20 cricket, I see Malinga at the top of his run, moving into a slow jog as he kisses the ball, curly permed hair bouncing like a 1980s female soap opera character, arm and shoulder arching like a trebuchet as he reaches the crease, before delivering a flat yorker which rattles into the hapless batsman’s off stump, removing it from the ground like a cork from a champagne bottle. He is the best T20 cricketer in the world simply because he is the best bowler allied with the fact you know you can bowl him multiple overs in the powerplay, which is everything a captain could want.

3^rd – South Africa

They have a lot of good cricketers, but I’m not really sold on this South African T20 side. Their big bowling weapon, Dale Steyn, is coming in injured; Wayne Parnell is coming in injured; Morne Morkel has never really done it in T20s, and the spinners are the inconsistent Tahir and the limited Phangiso. The batting is better but not perfect, as whilst they have the genius that is AB de Villiers, I imagine he has had other things on his mind recently. Alluding to the captaincy, Faf du Plessis is in charge, his one proper audition if South Africa are thinking outside of the obvious choice. He is harmed by the fact that his biggest successes in T20 cricket have come as an opener, but they also have Hashim Amla, who has to open if he plays, and hugely talented youngster Quinton de Kock, who one day may rule the world but right it is a big ask for him to take on and thrive against the best bowlers in the world. However, they will be the best fielding side because that’s what South Africa always are, and they do have one ace up their sleeve.....

One to watch – David Miller

A player who is the true anti-Amla, all power and no grace, Miller has been hugely successful around the world in T20, and really thrust his name into the big time with a seen to be believed 101* for Kings XI against RCB in the 2013 IPL. If you bowl in his arc, it disappears, mainly through the leg side. He is technically limited, and hence against the very best bowlers he may well struggle, but he could utterly explode in any game, and win South Africa a game they have no right to.

4^th - Ireland

The final game will be between them and England – if England are out, and I think they will be, then Ireland are the team with more to gain from the game, and they posses almost as much talent.

5^th – England

Frankly, at the minute, they are a mess. Without wanting to open up old debates, the selection of the squad when it was originally announced beggared belief. If England wanted to end Kevin Pietersen’s career, that was fine, but it is typical of their winter that England have managed to engineer a situation which benefits none of those involved. The team could have done with his T20 ability and experience; Giles and Broad could have done with their best player; and Pietersen himself could have done with a goodbye that would simultaneously boost his IPL value. Mentioning Giles, England have a white ball coach who no-one knows whether he won’t be coaching England at all at the end of the tournament, or whether he’ll be in charge of all three formats, and has stated as a coach that his preference is for long format cricket.

Then, Joe Root broke a thumb, and England called up Ian Bell, who hasn’t played a professional T20 match for over three years, over Samit Patel, a like-for-like replacement (you wouldn’t get them confused though) or Owais Shah, the fifth highest run scorer in all T20 cricket. Ben Stokes broke his wrist punching a locker in the midst of poor form, leading to a deserved but uninspiring recall for Chris Woakes. Added to this both Stuart Broad and Eoin Morgan, captain and vice captain, are carrying injuries. England have the talent to win games, but a poor start could see the wheels fall off, and Ireland are more than capable of taking advantage.

One to watch – Jos Buttler

The one hope for England is that Jos Buttler does something extraordinary. Hugely successful in England’s domestic T20, Buttler has begun to translate his hitting into international white ball cricket whilst also improving his wicket keeping. The England Test wicket-keeper role is also vacant, so a big tournament from Buttler could catapult him into the keeping role in all three formats.

Group B

Winners – India

India can be summed up in one question – can their batting and spin bowling overcome their quick bowling? I think yes they can, particularly having seen the Dhaka wicket than Bangladesh murdered Afghanistan on. They have three proven spinners in the IPL in Ashwin, Jadeja and Mishra, who gets a long overdue chance in international t20 cricket. The batting is outstanding – Rohit Sharma, Shikhar Dhawan, Ajinka Rahane, Yuvraj Singh and Suresh Raina have great track records either internationally or in the IPL, and that’s ignoring the jewels in the crown – Virat Kohli and MS Dhoni. Kohli will set you up, and Dhoni will knock you down. In a tight game chasing, if India have one of these two at the crease, you know who you are backing.

The weakness is the fast bowling. Varun Aaron is raw, cricket language for inconsistent. Buvi Kumar looks accurate and can swing the ball, but if he sticks it in the slot he’s not quick enough to be anything other than a free hit. Mohit Sharma is a slightly worse version of Kumar, whilst Mohammed Shami, a bowler I rate, is untried in t20. India’s big weakness is if they are defending in a tight game and one of those four has to bowl a couple of overs under pressure. Anything else and they are nigh on unbeatable.

One to watch – Virat Kohli

He follows some great players into the India team, but I would put my neck out and say he has the potential to be better than any of them. The ability of Tendulkar allied with the backbone of Ganguly, there is no obvious deficiency in his game other than his ego, and there are signs that this is beginning to disappear. I hope India don’t lumber him with the captaincy, because when he is batting he is a real box office player, full of sub continent style and stroke play. He is on his way to becoming the best player in the world, and maybe the best to watch as well.

2^nd – Australia

A not very likeable bunch of individuals, but this is potentially a great t20 side. The loss of Mitchell Johnson will hurt, enough that I have changed my pre-tournament prediction that they would win it all, but they are still very good. The potential top four is frightening, with David Warner in the form of his life, Aaron Finch a proven t20 star around the world, Cameron White coming off a huge Big Bash and lastly, and most importantly, Shane Watson – Player of the Tournament at the last World t20 and the last IPL. Watson sums up this side – not someone whom you want to do well, but will do well in this format regardless.

People will point to the spinners and the old boys as weak points, but there is method behind the madness. Successful spinners in t20 tend to be one of two things – experienced or unknown. In Brad Hogg and James Muirhead, the Aussies have both bases covered. Brad Hodge and Doug Bollinger may be past their best, but they are both proven quantities in t20, particularly Hodge, who has an outstanding record as a finisher.

One to watch – George Bailey

George Bailey’s relationship with the Australian public and media is a fickle and complicated one. Selected as captain of their t20 side before he’d played an international, he drew derision from those in Australia where the common thinking is the best eleven should be picked, and then the captain from them. He did well enough to get into the ODI side, where it was heralded as a sign of how weak the Australians were. Then something changed – Bailey dared to stand up to Steve McNamara, owner of Channel 9, the broadcasting company in Australia. Channel 9’s criticism of him became even more viscous. But the Australian public could see a hatchet job, and warmed to Bailey. He is now in the odd situation where the more the pundits criticise him the more the public like him.

Bailey’s captaincy, often ignored by his detractors, is superb. Tasmania tried and failed to win the Sheffield Shield for 100 years. Bailey won three for them as captain. He is credited within the Australian dressing room as being key in helping Darren Lehmann get his message across, along with Ryan Harris. He’s seen as a nice guy, a grafter who lacks talent, a thinking man’s cricketer – no wonder the former Aussie pros hate him. Nothing sums him up better than the day he won his third title with Tasmania, Brett Geeves wrote an article in the national press saying how rubbish he was. In short, Bailey is a captain with an outstanding record hated by the Australian cricket establishment and liked by the public – win this tournament and he might finally change a few minds.

3^rd – Pakistan

Pretty much since the retirement of Saeed Anwar every time you review Pakistan you have to say the same thing. Bowling excellent, fielding poor, and batting awful. I got burnt saying Pakistan would win the tournament last time around, as once again their batting prevented their bowlers from taking a deserved title. Junaid Khan and Umar Gul are two very handy quicks, particularly Junaid, who is going to make a huge breakthrough sooner or later. The spin is outstanding, and varied. Saaed Ajmal is the best spin bowler in world cricket, although perhaps not in t20 (it’s a shame he isn’t allowed to play in the IPL to see him in contrast to Narine), Shahid Afridi an excellent white ball bowler, and they are added to by Mohammed Hafeez’s darts. The final bowler will be between Bilawal Bhatti, Mohammed Talha, Sohail Tanvir and Zulfiqar Babar, a decent bowling attack in their own right.

But then there’s the batting, and to a certain extent, the fielding, and there are question marks everywhere. Umar Akmal is probably their best player but he remains mired in inconsistency, Hafeez has had a poor year, and whilst Ahmed Shehzad, Sohaib Maqsood and Sharjeel Khan are all decent looking prospects they are all fairly inexperienced. Given they are also missing Misbah’s captaincy and Younis Khan’s experience I’m inclined to back Australia to survive trial by spin against them.

One to watch – Shahid Afridi

Afridi is perhaps the ultimate poster boy for Pakistan cricket – brilliant and inconsistent in often the same over, controversial, and a brilliant bowler who underachieves with the bat. His bowling in t20 is very good, mixing some nippy leg spin with an excellent arm ball (it’s not a googly, he bowls it from wide of the crease), and he also bowls pretty smartly - which makes his often stupid batting all the more galling. I’m not sure Afridi has ever faced a ball he didn’t think he could hit for six, and perishes often trying just that. But if he comes off, it’s game over, and with Kieron Pollard injured, he is the player after Chris Gayle that will cause the most fear. When he plays well, Pakistan can beat anyone, but does he want to bat for his reputation, or for the side?

4^th – West Indies

I’ve put them fourth in this group, but they could just as equally lose every game as win the entire tournament. The talent is there, but they are even more maddeningly inconsistent as individuals than Pakistan, and the feel good vibes of Darren Sammy’s captaincy at the last tournament have turned into, as the West Indian media would have you believe, a big split in the dressing room between a Sammy camp and a Bravo camp. Chris Gayle has a look of distinct disinterest at the moment, but the big crowds may get the juices flowing once again for Gayle, who is the world leading t20 batter.

The pace bowling looks the weak spot, although Krishmar Santokie has impressed in his limited appearances. Sunil Narine is the real strength in the bowling, a real mystery spinner who has humiliated far better players than Luke Wright, as he did in the warm up series. Samuel Badree (more on him below) provides the backup spin option, but he’ll likely open the bowling with one of the quicks. Dwayne Bravo often takes wickets in t20, and can obviously swing the blade as well, but his strength is as a wicket-taker and not as an economic bowler, the absence of which is a real problem. Kieron Pollard’s injury is also a nuisance but West Indies will hope they can cover him with improved performances from Bravo and Sammy.

One to watch – Samuel Badree

Describing Samuel Badree as a leg-spinner seems unfair, as he doesn’t really turn the ball, or even give it that much chance to spin. Badree’s flat, slight turning leg spin is almost like a difficult to judge medium pacer, as he fires the ball in towards leg stump with virtually no flight. It doesn’t sound like much, but early on in powerplay it’s tough for a batter at the start of their innings to hit over the top against that type of bowling. West Indies will look for Badree to get his four overs in for under twenty, forcing sides to attack Narine.

5^th Bangladesh

How they will wish they’d been drawn in the other group

Semi-Finals

Australia beat New Zealand

I fancy Australia to have too much here, for everything New Zealand do well Australia do slightly better. Johnson is a loss but the Aussies will win a high scoring game.

India beat Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka don’t quite have the batting to set India a decent target, and with Kohli and Dhoni, they have two elite finishers who can handle Malinga.

Final

India beat Australia

India’s spinners will get them home to win the crown over Australia, whose lack of a proven international spinner will come back to haunt them.

Player of the Tournament – Virat Kohli

Most Runs – Shane Watson

Most Wickets – Ravi Ashwin

Guide to the Group Stage

This World T20 is made up of two stages, the first beginning on the 16^th. Here are the eight sides taking part, what I make of them, and which two will go through to join the big boys.

Group A – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Hong Kong and Nepal

Afghanistan

Who are they?

The feel good story of cricket, even if it has been told several times before every game they played. Formed just prior to the invasion and overthrow of the Taliban in 2001, Afghanistan have flown up the world rankings, and along with Ireland, regularly form the top two in all Associate cricket.

Are they any good?

They are pretty handy. Now fully involved in the Asia Cup cricket, they beat Bangladesh in the group stage. India, Sri Lanka and Pakistan all beat them comfortably, but there is the feeling that they belong if not at the top table, then they should at least be able to join the others for a meal. It would help if they could play matches in their own country, but should that be fixed or the ICC is happy with their current arrangement with the UAE, then Test status may not be far away.

Who is their star man?

They are in possession of some pretty decent cricketers – captain Mohammed Nabi, wicket-keeper batter Mohammed Shahzad (he has his own version of the helicopter shot), and hugely improved all-rounder Samiullah Shenwari. But their star man is Hamid Hassan, the bandana wearing fast bowler. Whilst the previous three cricketers are all good players, other sides in this stage know they have players to match them. But Hassan is quick, having been clocked at around and above 90mph, and when fit, often takes bundles of wickets, including in his brief forays against Test sides. When fit though is a big caveat, as Hassan seems to almost constantly be breaking down injured – it goes without saying that Afghanistan need him fit for the huge game with Bangladesh.

Bangladesh

Who are they?

Bangladesh must look at Afghanistan and say to themselves that once upon a time, the rest of the cricket world used to talk about them like that. Given Test status in 2000, Bangladesh have spent most of the next 14 years travelling the world playing in two match series that the host nation doesn’t want to play, and then wins 2-0. The last six months have been particularly bracing, as after 12 months of promising results, they were utterly obliterated by Sri Lanka, and lost all four games, at home, in the Asia cup.

Are they any good?

At the minute, no. These are worrying times for Bangladesh cricket, as India, England and Australia’s coup of cricket has left them hanging onto their Test status, with the word “relegation” banded around. Ireland keep winning everything at Associate level, Afghanistan keep improving, and Bangladesh keep losing. They could really do with a good tournament, or the defeat to Afghanistan in the Asia Cup will soon be seen as a symbolic moment.

Who is their star man?

When not getting banned for making dodgy hand gestures on TV, Shakib Al Hasan is still the best cricketer Bangladesh have by some distance. He’s a good all-rounder, but it’s about time his runs and wickets meant Bangladesh won a few games. If I was being a bit more original, I might have suggested Mominul Haque, a fluent left hander who has made a very promising start to his international career.

Hong Kong

Who are they?

Well, no-one really knows. The qualifier produced six teams, the established forces of Ireland and Afghanistan, old perennials the Netherlands, exciting new boys Nepal and hosts for that tournament and seemingly every cricket tournament, the UAE. Hong Kong snuck in there as well somewhat unnoticed. The game has always had a history in Hong Kong, but their qualification was somewhat unexpected.

Are they any good?

Well, they’ve had a good run recently, qualifying for this tournament by beating Papua New Guinea, and nearly qualifying for the 2015 ODI World Cup, with the consolation of ODI status for the first time until 2018. Their qualification for this tournament was based on the beating of every side they should have done (every other qualifier for this tournament that played them beat them), but they got some decent results in the ODI qualifier, beating eventual winners Scotland, the only team to do so.

Who is their star man?

Haseeb Amjad, the former Pakistan U19 cricketer (thanks Cricinfo), took 33 wickets across the two qualifiers, and would appear to be their main bowling threat, armed with reverse swing. Another Pakistan born player, Irfan Ahmed, leads their batting with power but not it seems consistency.

Nepal

Who are they?

The new Afghanistan, truth be told. I got on the Nepal bandwagon early, bizarrely through a US based news sites photos of the week, which showed Nepal playing the US in front of 15,000 people in Nepal. That isn’t a freak attendance, Nepal get 15,000 fans for every home game. Remember that next time you watch New Zealand play at home. They’ve risen the ranks of the Associate teams, and in the UAE in the T20 qualifier, they beat Hong Kong on the final ball to qualify, in front of 2,000 ex-pats who’d moved to the UAE for work, who promptly went absolutely mad. It cannot be over stated what a fantastic achievement a nation that is mainly mountain achieving well in a sport that requires a huge expanse of flat land, nor the love the Nepalese have quickly grown for cricket.

Are they any good?

Without wanting to patronise Nepal, I am going to have to. Qualifying was a massive, joyous surprise, and has probably come too early in their development for them to consider beating Afghanistan and Bangladesh. Having qualified for this tournament, they spent most of the ODI qualifier getting absolutely hammered by the teams they beat in t20. If they beat Hong Kong, the tournament is a success.

Who is their star man?

Captain Paras Khadka is the focal point for the side, and has been extremely vocal in the media about Nepal cricket before the tournament. Khadka is hugely popular back home, but a year ago Shakti Gauchan was good enough to get a trial for the IPL, and in the qualifier Sharad Vesawkar proved an excellent finisher – it was he who hit the winning runs against Hong Kong.

Group B – Ireland, Netherlands, UAE and Zimbabwe

Ireland

Who are they?

The 9^th best cricket side in the world at t20, and if they got to play the better teams more often, they might well be higher than that.

Are they any good?

They are very handy, and in terms of Associate cricket, extremely. They won all three major tournaments for the Associates in the three different formats in 2013, and their best player will likely end up captaining England in this tournament. Bangladesh are very keen not to play Ireland in any format and with good reason – Ireland would beat them.

Who is their star man?

I’m going for broke here and saying that for this tournament, Paul Stirling will fire and not fail as he did in the West Indies. A somewhat portly figure that would not sit well with the England establishment, Stirling hits big opening the batting. What will be really handy for Ireland is that he bowls decent off-spin as well, and Ireland may use him as an opening bowler. But they have a lot of good cricketers – George Dockrell is a very tidy left arm spinner, Kevin O’Brien humiliated England in the last World Cup and William Porterfield is one of the better captains in the tournament.

Netherlands

Who are they?

The Netherlands always seem to have been near the top of the Associate tree without ever making the leap forward into either Test status or a conclusive argument for it. They’ve always benefited from a close relationship with South Africa that now seems to have dried up, and Ireland and Afghanistan have overtaken them. On the current trend others may too.

Are they any good?

Whilst they qualified for the tournament, they didn’t do so with the ease they would have done previously. Defeat in the quarter-finals left them needing to beat Scotland in a playoff to qualify, which they did. At the ODI World Cup qualifier they didn’t even make the final stage. Losing Ryan ten Doeschate and Troy Cooper have been big blows.

Who is their star man?

The two quick bowlers who got them here are Ahsan Malik and Mudassar Bukhari, but they may struggle to transfer their success to Bangladesh pitches. Wesley Barresi is their wicket-keeper, but was also their highest run scorer at both tournaments. For the Netherlands to have any hope they need to post runs and he is their most consistent run scorer.

UAE

Who are they?

Until a while ago a very second rate cricket team whose main role was to host Associate tournaments, Pakistan tours, and bring together Indian and Pakistani cricketers to play together. The only major tournament they had previously qualified for was the 1996 World Cup, a side which contained only one home born player, the extremely wealthy Sultan Zarawani, who was made captain, and in their first game of the tournament decided to face Allan Donald without a helmet with predictable results. Not that it has much to do with the current UAE side, but I never fail to smile when I read that story.

Are they any good?

Things are looking pretty rosy in the land of the UAE. They get a regular dose of international cricket to keep their native players interested as Pakistan play their home matches there, nearly all Associate tournaments are played there as a result of money the facilities on offer, and they have qualified for both this tournament and the ODI World Cup next year.

Who is their star man?

The UAE were solid rather than spectacular in qualification for this tournament (they were spectacular in the ODI World Cup qualifier), but captain Khurram Khan easily out scored all of his teammates in both tournaments, and chipped in with wickets as well. At 42, this and the ODI World Cup will be his only chances at international recognition, so he’d better make the most of it.

Zimbabwe

Who are they?

Well, a Test playing nation apparently, quite often a vote for the BCCI in any dispute, and involved in a quite incredible farce over pay with their players and loans with the ICC. None of the Test playing nations want to play them because it’s a pain for Zimbabwe to play anyone given they have very little money, and none of the Associates see anything to be gained from touring.

Are they any good?

Bizarrely, they are quite probably better than Bangladesh. Despite all of the off-field problems, when Zimbabwe manage to get eleven players on the field in the vain hope they may be paid, they can give the Test teams a good match. Zimbabwe seems to be a case of natural talent squandered by a corrupt, incompetent system. They will not be particularly happy to have had Ireland drawn in their group, with only one going through.

Who is their star man?

Well, it would be pace bowler Kyle Jarvis, but he sadly is good enough to be paid for playing cricket, and has an English passport, so he retired from international cricket at the age of 24 and will be playing for Lancashire for this year and one would expect many years in the future. Their best player without him is Brendan Taylor, their captain. For most sides being captain has the management of tactics and personnel to be worried about, but Taylor has the added pressure of a vastly reduced coaching staff and being the chief negotiator with the board over pay. It’s no wondering his stats for ODI and t20s are fairly unimpressive over the past two years. I could make a cheap gag about off-spinner Prosper Utseya prospering in Bangladesh, whilst Elton Chigumbura is a poster boy for unharnessed Zimbabwean talent.

What’s going to happen?

Group A - The tournament opens with the two big games, Bangladesh v Afghanistan and Nepal v Hong Kong. The other four games should be foregone conclusions, given that these are the two smallest teams in the tournament playing against two established sides in home conditions. I want Nepal to beat Hong Kong, but they have to go into that game second favourite. Bangladesh and Afghanistan is a huge game given the context – if Hamid plays, and if Afghanistan bat first, I’m backing them to set a decent score and Bangladesh to crumble under the pressure.

1 – Afghanistan 2 – Bangladesh 3 – Hong Kong 4 – Nepal

Group B – Similar to the other group, the big games are the first two. Ireland are better prepared than Zimbabwe, and should beat them. The UAE should fancy their chances of beating the Netherlands in these conditions, and another upset is not beyond them, but with only one going through Ireland should prove too much.

1 – Ireland 2 – Zimbabwe 3 – UAE 4 - Netherlands

6 Cricketers to Watch in 2014

After last year's mixed bag here are another six

George Dockrell

In 2013, Ireland had quite the year. The associate nations have a red ball tournament. Ireland won that. They had an ODI tournament. Ireland won that. There was the T20 qualifier. Ireland won that. Irish cricket is in a very good place at the minute, where they completely dominate the other associate nations, particularly in white ball cricket, where they can compete with the lesser nations. At the world T20 this year, they face Zimbabwe, UAE and the Netherlands. They should win that group at a canter, and when they do, they can give South Africa, England, New Zealand and Sri Lanka a hugely tough match.

Ireland’s main problem is their talent drain to England. Their current side is very good, but would be hugely improved by Boyd Rankin, and in particular, both the middle order batting and potential captaincy of Eoin Morgan (William Porterfield is a very good captain whose batting has suffered greatly because of it). The latest player they could lose could be Dockrell, a highly talented left-arm spinner with huge experience in the white ball formats. Still only 21, and likely to bowl his full quota in every game of the world t20 (for Ireland that should be eight games); Dockrell has a chance to put himself in the shop window, either for England, or for the IPL. England need a spinner, and they may be tempted to head to the Emerald Isle again.

Nic Maddinson

Following a similar path to David Warner, and with a similar style, Nic Maddinson is the latest hard hitting left hander to come from Australia. Now 22, Maddinson has impressed since his debut at 18 for New South Wales with his power hitting. Whilst the aggressive and often aerial style are reminiscent of Warner, his stature is more that of Chris Gayle, if much less solidly built. Maddinson forte was T20 cricket, but many in Australia are impressed with his willingness to learn, shown by some excellent performances in the last Australian summer.

Maddinson was touted as a talent for the future, and made a strong impression on the Australian A tour before the Ashes series, where he was the highest run scorer. A T20 debut in India followed, but with Chris Rogers now 36, and Alex Doolan not in the white ball sides and therefore only able to make his case for a short period each year, if Maddinson can find a way into the white ball teams again, with a world T20 in April, it could be a very impressive and important year for him.

Tymal Mills

In a world of bigger bats, shorter boundaries, and greater freedom for batsman to play shots, the role of the true fast bowler has been threatened. The quicker they are, the faster they go. With Brett Lee and Shoaib Akhtar retiring, and Shaun Tait playing T20 only, it appeared true fast bowling might die. Fortunately, the performances of Mitchell Johnson this year, not just in his headline catching Ashes series, but also in his excellent performances in the IPL, have shown that fast bowling is not dead.

Tymal Mills bowls fast. He does not bowl accurately; he doesn’t swing it and doesn’t possess the canny nuances of a seasoned paceman. He simply runs in, and fires the ball at the batsman as quickly as possible. Bought onto the Ashes tour to give England practice against left-arm pace, Mills impressed all onlookers, particularly the Australian media set, with his natural pace. Tim Bresnan can master both swing and reverse swing, and he may get on top of a particular batsman. But medium and slow medium bowlers will never scare an entire side, as Johnson has done in this Ashes, and there is no terror in a batsman’s mind like knowing the bowler is simply too quick. England face Sri Lanka (destroyed by Johnson last winter) and India this summer, two nations not renowned for their ability to play hostile, short pitched bowling. In ODI’s England may well advised to unleash Mills.

Sam Robson

Nick Compton, Joe Root and now Michael Carberry have all opened for England in 2013. Compton failed as he became completely introverted (not to mention the growing concerns about his role within the dressing room). Root was moved down the order after himself and Alistair Cook were unable to form a working opening partnership, one of them continually falling early, and now Carberry and Cook have suffered exactly the same problem. All three struggled to rotate the strike and score, and all failed to form a relationship with Cook.

The next opening bat off the rank appears to be Sam Robson. Born and raised in Australia, Robson possesses an iron clad technique and has shown an ability to bat for long period of time. He’s England qualified through his parents, and throughout his early professional career was the subject of the affections of both the ECB and CA to declare for them. Robson chose not to declare for either country until he had qualified for both, before choosing to tour Australia with England Lions this winter. Technically sound, hugely mentally rated by all who have worked with him, it may be Robson’s turn this summer.

Natalie Sciver

The one bright spark in this men’s Ashes series has been the emergence of Ben Stokes, a hugely promising all-rounder with match winning potential with both bat and ball. England women found their version in the summer in the shape of Tokyo-born Surrey all-rounder Natalie Sciver, who looks the best prospect in English women’s cricket since Sarah Taylor.

Sciver has been highly rated from a young age, but concerns over her fitness left her on the outside looking in during 2012. Going through the England Academy eased those concerns, and Sciver’s rise in 2013 has been meteoric. In February 2013 she was England’s standby player for the World Cup. Come June she made her debut against Pakistan, winning player of the match in her second game. Selected in the Ashes squad, she wasn’t selected for either the Test or the first ODI, which England drew, then lost. She played the next five games, all of which England won. In October she took England’s first ever T20 hat-trick, impressing with both bat and ball in a tri-series in West Indies. She fulfils the role of batting six and bowling sixth that England need, combining with Jenny Gunn to give England two genuine all-rounders.

The careers of Sciver and Stokes can well be compared. Both 21, both hugely talented and appreciated as such from a young age, both held back by non-cricket problems (although being a bit chubby is probably a lesser crime than Stokes’ drink driving) and both now heavily involved in England cricket, they both have the potential to win a number of games for England in the next decade.

Mohammed Shami

I have been watching cricket long enough to remember the last really good Indian quick bowler. Not Zaheer Khan, who despite being a very accomplished swing/seam bowler, was never a quick bowler with the skills they bring, such as bouncers and aggression. The last Indian quick bowler was Javagal Srinath, a highly skilled operator who took 236 Test wickets and 315 ODI wickets, often using methods alien to the current crop of Indian fast bowlers – pace, bounce and aggression.

Watching Mohammed Shami in his Test career so far has reminded me of Srinath. Ishant Sharma and Umesh Yadav are talented bowlers, but they often give the impression that they don’t know how to use the fast bowling skills they possess. Bouncers are bowled not with intent, but as a ball to be used to change lengths and get a dot ball. Shami bowls his bouncer with intent. He’s not as quick as Srinath was, but there is time to add muscle, to refine technique. India really struggled in England on their last tour due to the lack of anything approaching even an adequate seam bowler. Shami may surprise a few people this time around.

Six others worth a look – Corey J Anderson, Jamie Overton, Unmukt Chand, Monimul Haque, Chadd Sayers and Holly Ferling.