Showing posts with label India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label India. Show all posts

Monday, 21 July 2014

We Are The Professionals

“I'm trying my heart out to do this
“I've got to start scoring runs as well, that can only happen with a lot of hard work.
“he's desperate to keep on playing and wants to turn this around.
“he's a fighter and we want people like that in the dressing room."
“I'm desperate to turn things around for England.
“He knows he has been under pressure for a long time
“He knows it is tough up here
“He is up for the challenge
“There's a group of players in there who are desperate to win for England.
“It will take a lot of determination to turn this around.
“International cricket is about tough decisions”
“It is meant to be a tough environment
“I knew it was going to be tough


Above are a few of the quotes from Alistair Cook and Peter Moores after defeat in the 2nd Test to India. They betray the mindset of this current England side, and it can be argued, the English cricket mindset as a whole. The running theme is clear – it’s about pressure, it’s about fight, it’s about working harder.

To hear these comments come from a sports team is no surprise, and in fact is probably what you would hear from most sports teams. But this mistakes sport for a matter of life and death – the mindset is militaristic, demanding perfect discipline from the troops. The pressure is talked about and amplified, used as a further incentive to be disciplined. The demand for extra effort is incessant, the mantra to live by. It is about winning and losing, life and death.

Sport though is not a matter of life and death, yet part of the entertainment business. You do not hear actors talking about how desperate they are to perform well, musicians talking about fighting hard for their next album, authors talking about the tough environment that being an author is. If they did, it would be pointed out as the utter bollocks that it is. Being an entertainer, which sportsmen and women are, is not about discipline but expression – technical skills are simply a tool, not the end objective.

This mindset is seen in a number of sports and almost for a generation but it’s only now becoming obvious how detrimental this can be.

When England arrived in Australia we were told how hard they had worked, how fit they were – we are often told that this is the fittest and most professional cricket side ever. Fitness is important for cricket but not the most important aspect. It’s like being the snooker player with the most cue power – it’s useful, but nowhere near as important as hitting the ball where you want it to go.

The obsession with professionalism is even more damaging. England are a very professional cricket side – their players turn up on time, they train long hours, they wear the right clothes, they say the right things, they know all of the plans, they eat the right things and they behave in the right way. This is all well and good when the environment is under your complete control. The moment something unexpected happens there is simply no-one with the problem solving ability to come up with a solution. The plan is blindly followed when it works, and when it doesn’t, it’s followed anyway so that at the end of the game the plan can be changed slightly and if we lose, well, at least we had a plan. The plan by its very nature is highly conventional and cannot take into account the various complex factors that make up a game of cricket. That’s not to say a plan isn’t important – it is, but it should be like a movie script without dialogue, a general set of ideas where the players fill in the blanks.



When the plan doesn’t work, either for the team or player, the world becomes a very lonely place. The players will struggle, but far more fundamentally, they don’t understand why they are struggling and sure as hell don’t have any idea how to stop struggling. This England side is struggling badly, and until they appreciate that sport is not a war to be won, but a piece of entertainment to be enjoyed, and that blindly following over-prescriptive plans to get them out of problems that these plans helped create in the first place is self-defeating, then they will continue to play joyless, losing cricket.

Wednesday, 9 July 2014

England's Top 25 Cricketers After Sri Lanka




After England’s disappointing treble defeat to Sri Lanka, here’s the top 25:-

On the bubble – Adam Riley (with every wicket he takes he looks more like the Ashes 2015 spinner), Scott Borthwick (needed wickets, got runs), James Harris (swings the ball but needs a fitness run), Graham Onions (injured, and that could be that for him), Monty Panesar (the best spinner in England needs to behave himself), James Taylor (Seems destined to be solid eighth choice), Jonny Bairstow (getting the run of keeping opportunities he needs), Nick Compton (still there abouts but needs the spectacular)

25 (20) – Simon Kerrigan

He would have been hugely disappointed not to get the nod for the Test side, and it was a bit of a kick in the teeth for all the spinners to see an all-rounder chosen as the Test spinner. His bowling has been solid for Lancashire in unhelpful conditions, and he has a working relationship with Peter Moores. It seems Ali will be entrenched for the rest of the summer, and as Kerrigan doesn’t play white ball cricket for Lancashire, he doesn’t have a route into the ODI side. England tour the West Indies in April after the World Cup, and they will need a spinner there. Kerrigan needs to keep himself ahead of Adam Riley the rest of the summer.

24 (RE) – Michael Carberry

In some cases criticising the England management has proved terminal, so when Michael Carberry opened up on his perceived poor treatment during the winter, it was assumed his international career was over. However, he got another chance in the white ball sides, but failed to impress in both innings. With Sam Robson making a Test hundred, and Darryl Mitchell having exploded, it’s hard to see Carberry making the Test side, but with Cook in horrible form, and under heavy criticism, a World Cup spot is probable, and a starting spot possible.

23 (NE) – James Vince

http://cricketbadger.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Vince-Whites-Bat-Leicestershire-AgeasBowl-NJM-2-720x400.jpg.pagespeed.ce.gU4HSWPay2.jpg

A player marked out from an early age for England honours, Vince has always benefitted from the “Bell effect”, where a player’s ability is over-estimated due to the quality of their stroke play. With Vince in 2014, the occasional glorious innings and large number of cameos has become a tidal wave of runs, and he is the top run scorer in England and the first to 1,000 runs. Added to that a captaincy role which he has taken to well, and a high strike rate, and it seems a case of when and not if for Vince with international honours.

22 (RE) – Samit Patel

Vince is the top run scorer in the country, and Samit is second. 20 innings, 2 hundred, 6 fifties and 4 ducks tell a story of inconsistency, but Patel has done the business for Nottinghamshire, and has done it in Division 1. His bowling has plateaued slightly, and whilst he is accurate he doesn’t offer much of a wicket taking threat. He spent the Sri Lanka series on the outside looking in, but must have pushed Ali close for the role in the Test team, and is another player with the game to push for a spot in all three sides.

21 (NE) – Harry Gurney

A slightly uninspiring selection, Gurney made the most of his opportunity and bowled strongly against Sri Lanka, whilst also maintaining his form for Nottinghamshire. Gurney is not particularly quick, and doesn’t offer a huge deal of movement, but he bowled accurately and to his field, and his slower ball caused Sri Lanka problems. The key for Gurney is that slower ball stays a mystery until the World Cup, because if players work it out he could be fodder in Australia. He deserves to be in and around the ODI squad for the future and his World Cup chances are good.

20 (25) – James Tredwell

If England don’t like the look of any of the young spinners, and Moeen Ali doesn’t work out, could James Tredwell receive a second Test cap? He bowled extremely well during the ODI series, and is currently in the envious position of being the only full-time spinner that England are selecting. His major problem is that Riley has pushed ahead of him at Kent, giving a nudge to the England selectors.

19 (21) – Alex Hales

It was all beginning to look a bit grim for Hales before the t20 match against Sri Lanka, as England didn’t seem to fancy him for ODIs, and Nottinghamshire seemed to be losing patience. 66 that day highlighted his ability, and Cook and Carberry’s subsequent struggles in the ODI series pushed for involvement in that side. Since, he’s returned to Nottinghamshire with a big hundred and two nineties (Hales is a real nervous nineties merchant) and everything is looking rosy again. The World Cup might come too soon but if Cook’s and England’s ODI form continues there will be a vacancy at the top of the order at the end of that tournament.

18 (17) – Tim Bresnan

Bresnan was finally dropped from all formats for the Sri Lanka series, but with Chris Woakes only playing one game and Plunkett only the Tests, he’s still in with a strong shout with his multi-format game. Has a huge advantage as he goes back to play for the best side in county cricket, so his wickets and runs are likely to contribute to a successful Division 1 side, which always counts for that little bit extra. Might not feature this summer but a winter tour spot is certainly achievable.

17 (15) – Chris Woakes

Only played in the t20 despite being in all three squads, it was hard to get a feel for where Woakes is an international level. Pleasingly he touched the high 80s with his speed, which suggests that the loss of speed that hurt him chances so greatly might be gone. To get into the side, Woakes needs to find the excellent batting form from the previous two years that has deserted him in 2014.

16 (8) – Steven Finn

When I last wrote about Finn he was the top wicket-taker in the country, whilst England had the untested Chris Jordan and the cheap imitation Liam Plunkett. The past eight weeks couldn’t have gone much worse for Finn – he’s been injured and struggled when selected, Jordan has nailed down his ODI spot and Plunkett his Test spot. It is a fairly obvious statement, but I am going to say it anyway – he needs to get fit, take wickets for Middlesex again and show he possesses everything that Plunkett does.

15 (NE) – Liam Plunkett

http://e0.365dm.com/13/08/768x432/liam-plunkett-lions-v-australia_2988531.jpg?20130817145844

England’s phoenix from the flames, Plunkett bowled quickly with Lords without actually delivering much, before nine wickets at Headingley backed the selector’s faith. This was a win for the England Lions, for whom Plunkett was superb on the tour of Sri Lanka during the winter, a win for the selectors who choose to take a 28 year-old on that tour, and a huge win to the fast growing reputation, utterly deserved, of Jason Gillespie. England may be forced to choose between Chris Jordan and Plunkett for the first Test against India, and at the moment it should be Plunkett who plays.

14 (11) – Ravi Bopara

A good fifty at Lords aside and a t20 cameo aside, Bopara was a disappointment against Sri Lanka. His bowling, so effective over the winter in positions of weakness, was completely ineffectual when he often found himself bowling in a position of strength. That said, Bopara has, and deserves, credit in the bank for his performances over the winter and in white ball cricket for Essex seems unstoppable.

13 (14) – Chris Jordan

Superb in the ODI series, Jordan bought some real aggression and pace, along with a slightly wonky radar. His Test performances could be summed up as acceptable, although Plunkett’s emergence overshadowed him. His performances in the ODIs, given the World Cup is in Australia, makes him a certain squad member there and in truth only Anderson among the bowlers should start ahead of him.

12 (12) – Eoin Morgan

Last time I wrote about Morgan he had been superb for England and a disappointment for Middlesex. This time, Morgan was disappointing during the white ball cricket for England, but has delivered for Middlesex, with a blistering 191 against a very good Nottinghamshire attack. I might have pushed him down the list further, had it not been for Cook’s continuing struggles, and Morgan’s own pleasing captaincy for Middlesex. It would be a big surprise for him not to be confirmed as full-time t20 captain at the end of the summer.

11 (13) – Sam Robson

A very good hundred, and three failures. Sam Robson managed in his second Test to do what Alistair Cook hasn’t done for 12 and make a Test hundred, although Cook’s struggles and Robson’s low scores in the other innings mean England still haven’t had an opening partnership of note for well over a year. Until a pair settles down and starts making regular fifty partnerships, and whilst Cook remains captain and out of form, there is going to be pressure on the second opening spot and Robson is currently in the hot seat.

10 (19) – Moeen Ali

http://uwpics.urduwire.com/images_photos/photos/Moeen-Ali46513513_2014624215046.jpg

Sometimes necessity is the mother of invention, and that was certainly the case for Moeen Ali at Headingley. Three awful shots in the first three innings of his Test career, his spin bowling good but not making a case for a full time role, Ali was under big pressure but produced an innings of real substance. It gets quite irksome to hear professional commentators marvelling at the attractiveness of Ali’s stroke play – it’s no secret on the county scene – but innings of substance have occasionally been lacking, and here Ali delivered.

His bowling and hundred leave England with a big problem. His bowling is good but not good enough to be the full time spinner. The simple call before the final innings at Headingley was to drop Ali for Stokes, and Jordan for a full-time spinner, for the first Test against India - now that’s all up in the air. Ali’s performances should mean however that he gets a chance in the ODIs later in the summer, as an alternative to Tredwell this winter could be playing Ali at three, and using him and Root as the spinning options.

9 (7) – Ben Stokes

England’s new dawn got off to a staggeringly hypocritical start when Stokes wasn’t selected for the Test series against Sri Lanka, having played two First Class games for Durham, whilst Matt Prior was selected having only played once for Sussex. It gives rise to the feeling that for all his talent, England don’t really fancy Stokes as an individual, which is extremely concerning. He does have black marks against his name, but he also has a rare talent. For Durham, the batting hasn’t really fired, but the bowling has, with great comic timing – as England laboured on the 4th day at Headingley, Stokes took seven wickets for Durham.

8 (10) – Jos Buttler

If you are looking to get your name up in lights, then a chanceless, brilliant, near match winning hundred at Lords is probably the best way to do it. As England’s top order poked and prodded England to defeat, Buttler boomed and blasted his way to a superb 121, an innings described by some as England’s best ever ODI innings. His wicket-keeping was at best average, and was seen as the main reason for his non selection from the Test team. After Prior’s performance behind the stumps against Sri Lanka and more runs for Lancashire, Buttler is knocking on the door.

7 (9) – Gary Ballance

It was perhaps a surprise to see the best number five in the County Championship batting three for England, but maybe only Liam Plunkett comes out of the Test series with as much credit as Ballance. After a middling ODI series, Ballance produced a hundred of real quality (whether England should have let him get it is not a question for him), and backed it up in the 2nd Test. His fielding could do with a little bit of refinement but he’s in the England team for the long haul.

6 (5) – Matt Prior

If Peter Moores was hoping for the Matt Prior of 2011 and hoping not for the Matt Prior of 2013, he got neither – he got the Matt Prior of 2007. Flashy, and perhaps lucky to get the runs he did (the review system played into his hands), Prior produced the runs of a front line batsman. The problem was his keeping, which was decidedly dodgy. Prior was bought back to provide Cook with support, but that is reaching a lost cause now. It’s hard not to get the feeling that Prior is on the downward slope whilst Buttler’s star rises.

5 (6) – Joe Root

Having avoided the World t20 disaster with his broken thumb, Root had a very similar series to Ballance. A very middling ODI series was followed by an excellent double hundred, then nothing else. Root has a lot of credit in the bank, and rightly so, but are England going to continue to flog him to death by picking him for every game in every format?

4 (4) – Stuart Broad

It’s hard to avoid the obvious conclusion that England need to stop mucking about with Broad and send him for the knee surgery he admits he needs. England needed the spectacular from Broad and got average, bar a hat-trick, but with a World Cup around the corner, it seems foolish for England to force Broad through a Tests with bits floating around in his knee, giving the long term problems suffered by both Graeme Swann and Kevin Pietersen.

3 (2) – Ian Bell

This series was Ian Bell at his very worst. Looked in dazzling touch from the first ODI, Bell produced several fantastic shots, and not a single innings of note. As Ballance, Robson, Root and Ali showed, England do not need the pretty at the minute, but the runs, particularly in ODI cricket where given Cook’s form and Ballance’s inexperience, Bell might just be England’s most important batter. Last summer’s Ashes mean Bell is well in credit, and he destroyed India last time around – England may well need that again.

2 (3) – James Anderson

Subdued during the Ashes, quite possibly due to the broken rib he suffered at the hands of Mitchell Johnson, Anderson was back to somewhere close to his best against Sri Lanka. Almost forced an unlikely win in the 1st Test, and an unlikely draw in the 2nd, Anderson re-iterated his importance to this England attack in home conditions. Also gets bonus points for the funky field setting that perhaps led to Sangakarra’s dismissal in the 1st Test.

1 (1) – Alistair Cook

This was supposed to be the series where everything got back on track for Alistair Cook, where demons could be laid to rest, runs could be scored and wins could be had. At the end of the series, all of the troubles that were there before are still not only present but magnified. This was not Australia, with bowlers like Harris and Johnson and batters like Clarke and Warner. This was Sri Lanka in England in June, and England and Cook couldn’t get the job done.

The excuses are running out. Critics of Cook’s captaincy have been told to just look at his results, and then we started losing. We were told he was good off the pitch, and then things got so bad the ECB sacked Kevin Pietersen. We were told it was Andy Flower creating the negative mindset, and then we started giving the mighty Angelo Mathews one against the new ball. We were told Cook would do his talking not with his tactics, but his runs, and it’s now 12 months without a Test hundred.

Why is he still number 1? That’s because the ECB have backed him for the long term, and he is refusing to resign. English cricket’s success remains inexorably linked to Cook, he is the basket that the ECB have placed all their eggs in, and several reputations are based on his appointment and success as a captain. This really is make or break for Cook – England can win this series and he can score runs against this Indian attack, giving him momentum before the World Cup. If England lose, and Cook fails to deliver with the bat, it’s hard to see how his position would not be untenable.

Thursday, 20 March 2014

World T20 - The Main Tournament



After the Associate starter, here comes the main course

Group A

Winners – New Zealand

I will start off by saying that this is not the strongest group, although it gets the X-Factor of Ireland, a team capable of beating all four sides. New Zealand cricket is on a bit of an upswing after beating India, thanks to two immense performances from Brendon McCullum. Spin bowling is an issue, in fact a big issue, but so is it for everyone else in this group. With the exception of Kane Williamson, New Zealand have a power packed line-up, featuring McCullum, Ross Taylor, Martin Guptill and Corey Anderson, and a couple of their bowlers hit long as well. They won’t win all four games, but they will thrash someone (England?) and that will be enough for them to top the group.

One to watch – Tim Southee


Lots of people will be pointing to McCullum after his exploits against India, but he has struggled in t20 on subcontinent pitches, his explosion in game 1 of the IPL aside. Corey Anderson offers a lot in he can bowl, he can field, and he can hit it miles, but he is completely unproven in Asia. The man who will have a huge say in New Zealand’s performances is Tim Southee, who will bowl in the power play and at the death. Southee is not quick, but bowls an excellent yorker, and he’ll bowl the big overs for the Black Caps. The big problem for Southee is if he gets it wrong, its 80mph and it’s in the slot – in tight games, Southee will be the winner or loser for New Zealand.

2nd – Sri Lanka

Straight off the bat they have an unknown quantity as captain in Dinesh Chandimal, which given that the triumvirate of Jayawardene, Sangakarra and Dilshan seem to have been rotating the captaincy for the past thirty years, is a worry for them. However, on field captaincy under pressure can be fairly easy for Chandimal – he can just ask Lasith Malinga to bowl a yorker, which Malinga will inevitably produce. This is the standard Sri Lanka World Cup team, don’t look world beaters or paper, but don’t have any obvious weaknesses either. They’ll also follow the standard Sri Lanka World Cup formula of beating all the teams they should before losing to someone better in the knockout stages.

One to watch – Lasith Malinga


To a lot of people, when you say T20 cricket, they think of big hits, Chris Gayle smoking the ball out of the ground, AB de Villiers reverse scooping, Kieron Pollard plucking balls out of the sky. To me, when I hear T20 cricket, I see Malinga at the top of his run, moving into a slow jog as he kisses the ball, curly permed hair bouncing like a 1980s female soap opera character, arm and shoulder arching like a trebuchet as he reaches the crease, before delivering a flat yorker which rattles into the hapless batsman’s off stump, removing it from the ground like a cork from a champagne bottle. He is the best T20 cricketer in the world simply because he is the best bowler allied with the fact you know you can bowl him multiple overs in the powerplay, which is everything a captain could want.

3rd – South Africa

They have a lot of good cricketers, but I’m not really sold on this South African T20 side. Their big bowling weapon, Dale Steyn, is coming in injured; Wayne Parnell is coming in injured; Morne Morkel has never really done it in T20s, and the spinners are the inconsistent Tahir and the limited Phangiso. The batting is better but not perfect, as whilst they have the genius that is AB de Villiers, I imagine he has had other things on his mind recently. Alluding to the captaincy, Faf du Plessis is in charge, his one proper audition if South Africa are thinking outside of the obvious choice. He is harmed by the fact that his biggest successes in T20 cricket have come as an opener, but they also have Hashim Amla, who has to open if he plays, and hugely talented youngster Quinton de Kock, who one day may rule the world but right it is a big ask for him to take on and thrive against the best bowlers in the world. However, they will be the best fielding side because that’s what South Africa always are, and they do have one ace up their sleeve.....

One to watch – David Miller


A player who is the true anti-Amla, all power and no grace, Miller has been hugely successful around the world in T20, and really thrust his name into the big time with a seen to be believed 101* for Kings XI against RCB in the 2013 IPL. If you bowl in his arc, it disappears, mainly through the leg side. He is technically limited, and hence against the very best bowlers he may well struggle, but he could utterly explode in any game, and win South Africa a game they have no right to.

4th - Ireland

The final game will be between them and England – if England are out, and I think they will be, then Ireland are the team with more to gain from the game, and they posses almost as much talent.

5th – England

Frankly, at the minute, they are a mess. Without wanting to open up old debates, the selection of the squad when it was originally announced beggared belief. If England wanted to end Kevin Pietersen’s career, that was fine, but it is typical of their winter that England have managed to engineer a situation which benefits none of those involved. The team could have done with his T20 ability and experience; Giles and Broad could have done with their best player; and Pietersen himself could have done with a goodbye that would simultaneously boost his IPL value. Mentioning Giles, England have a white ball coach who no-one knows whether he won’t be coaching England at all at the end of the tournament, or whether he’ll be in charge of all three formats, and has stated as a coach that his preference is for long format cricket.

Then, Joe Root broke a thumb, and England called up Ian Bell, who hasn’t played a professional T20 match for over three years, over Samit Patel, a like-for-like replacement (you wouldn’t get them confused though) or Owais Shah, the fifth highest run scorer in all T20 cricket. Ben Stokes broke his wrist punching a locker in the midst of poor form, leading to a deserved but uninspiring recall for Chris Woakes. Added to this both Stuart Broad and Eoin Morgan, captain and vice captain, are carrying injuries. England have the talent to win games, but a poor start could see the wheels fall off, and Ireland are more than capable of taking advantage.

One to watch – Jos Buttler


The one hope for England is that Jos Buttler does something extraordinary. Hugely successful in England’s domestic T20, Buttler has begun to translate his hitting into international white ball cricket whilst also improving his wicket keeping. The England Test wicket-keeper role is also vacant, so a big tournament from Buttler could catapult him into the keeping role in all three formats.

Group B

Winners – India

India can be summed up in one question – can their batting and spin bowling overcome their quick bowling? I think yes they can, particularly having seen the Dhaka wicket than Bangladesh murdered Afghanistan on. They have three proven spinners in the IPL in Ashwin, Jadeja and Mishra, who gets a long overdue chance in international t20 cricket. The batting is outstanding – Rohit Sharma, Shikhar Dhawan, Ajinka Rahane, Yuvraj Singh and Suresh Raina have great track records either internationally or in the IPL, and that’s ignoring the jewels in the crown – Virat Kohli and MS Dhoni. Kohli will set you up, and Dhoni will knock you down. In a tight game chasing, if India have one of these two at the crease, you know who you are backing.

The weakness is the fast bowling. Varun Aaron is raw, cricket language for inconsistent. Buvi Kumar looks accurate and can swing the ball, but if he sticks it in the slot he’s not quick enough to be anything other than a free hit. Mohit Sharma is a slightly worse version of Kumar, whilst Mohammed Shami, a bowler I rate, is untried in t20. India’s big weakness is if they are defending in a tight game and one of those four has to bowl a couple of overs under pressure. Anything else and they are nigh on unbeatable.

One to watch – Virat Kohli


He follows some great players into the India team, but I would put my neck out and say he has the potential to be better than any of them. The ability of Tendulkar allied with the backbone of Ganguly, there is no obvious deficiency in his game other than his ego, and there are signs that this is beginning to disappear. I hope India don’t lumber him with the captaincy, because when he is batting he is a real box office player, full of sub continent style and stroke play. He is on his way to becoming the best player in the world, and maybe the best to watch as well.

2nd – Australia

A not very likeable bunch of individuals, but this is potentially a great t20 side. The loss of Mitchell Johnson will hurt, enough that I have changed my pre-tournament prediction that they would win it all, but they are still very good. The potential top four is frightening, with David Warner in the form of his life, Aaron Finch a proven t20 star around the world, Cameron White coming off a huge Big Bash and lastly, and most importantly, Shane Watson – Player of the Tournament at the last World t20 and the last IPL. Watson sums up this side – not someone whom you want to do well, but will do well in this format regardless.

People will point to the spinners and the old boys as weak points, but there is method behind the madness. Successful spinners in t20 tend to be one of two things – experienced or unknown. In Brad Hogg and James Muirhead, the Aussies have both bases covered. Brad Hodge and Doug Bollinger may be past their best, but they are both proven quantities in t20, particularly Hodge, who has an outstanding record as a finisher.

One to watch – George Bailey


George Bailey’s relationship with the Australian public and media is a fickle and complicated one. Selected as captain of their t20 side before he’d played an international, he drew derision from those in Australia where the common thinking is the best eleven should be picked, and then the captain from them. He did well enough to get into the ODI side, where it was heralded as a sign of how weak the Australians were. Then something changed – Bailey dared to stand up to Steve McNamara, owner of Channel 9, the broadcasting company in Australia. Channel 9’s criticism of him became even more viscous. But the Australian public could see a hatchet job, and warmed to Bailey. He is now in the odd situation where the more the pundits criticise him the more the public like him.

Bailey’s captaincy, often ignored by his detractors, is superb. Tasmania tried and failed to win the Sheffield Shield for 100 years. Bailey won three for them as captain. He is credited within the Australian dressing room as being key in helping Darren Lehmann get his message across, along with Ryan Harris. He’s seen as a nice guy, a grafter who lacks talent, a thinking man’s cricketer – no wonder the former Aussie pros hate him. Nothing sums him up better than the day he won his third title with Tasmania, Brett Geeves wrote an article in the national press saying how rubbish he was. In short, Bailey is a captain with an outstanding record hated by the Australian cricket establishment and liked by the public – win this tournament and he might finally change a few minds.

3rd – Pakistan

Pretty much since the retirement of Saeed Anwar every time you review Pakistan you have to say the same thing. Bowling excellent, fielding poor, and batting awful. I got burnt saying Pakistan would win the tournament last time around, as once again their batting prevented their bowlers from taking a deserved title. Junaid Khan and Umar Gul are two very handy quicks, particularly Junaid, who is going to make a huge breakthrough sooner or later. The spin is outstanding, and varied. Saaed Ajmal is the best spin bowler in world cricket, although perhaps not in t20 (it’s a shame he isn’t allowed to play in the IPL to see him in contrast to Narine), Shahid Afridi an excellent white ball bowler, and they are added to by Mohammed Hafeez’s darts. The final bowler will be between Bilawal Bhatti, Mohammed Talha, Sohail Tanvir and Zulfiqar Babar, a decent bowling attack in their own right.

But then there’s the batting, and to a certain extent, the fielding, and there are question marks everywhere. Umar Akmal is probably their best player but he remains mired in inconsistency, Hafeez has had a poor year, and whilst Ahmed Shehzad, Sohaib Maqsood and Sharjeel Khan are all decent looking prospects they are all fairly inexperienced. Given they are also missing Misbah’s captaincy and Younis Khan’s experience I’m inclined to back Australia to survive trial by spin against them.

One to watch – Shahid Afridi


Afridi is perhaps the ultimate poster boy for Pakistan cricket – brilliant and inconsistent in often the same over, controversial, and a brilliant bowler who underachieves with the bat. His bowling in t20 is very good, mixing some nippy leg spin with an excellent arm ball (it’s not a googly, he bowls it from wide of the crease), and he also bowls pretty smartly - which makes his often stupid batting all the more galling. I’m not sure Afridi has ever faced a ball he didn’t think he could hit for six, and perishes often trying just that. But if he comes off, it’s game over, and with Kieron Pollard injured, he is the player after Chris Gayle that will cause the most fear. When he plays well, Pakistan can beat anyone, but does he want to bat for his reputation, or for the side?

4th – West Indies

I’ve put them fourth in this group, but they could just as equally lose every game as win the entire tournament. The talent is there, but they are even more maddeningly inconsistent as individuals than Pakistan, and the feel good vibes of Darren Sammy’s captaincy at the last tournament have turned into, as the West Indian media would have you believe, a big split in the dressing room between a Sammy camp and a Bravo camp. Chris Gayle has a look of distinct disinterest at the moment, but the big crowds may get the juices flowing once again for Gayle, who is the world leading t20 batter.

The pace bowling looks the weak spot, although Krishmar Santokie has impressed in his limited appearances. Sunil Narine is the real strength in the bowling, a real mystery spinner who has humiliated far better players than Luke Wright, as he did in the warm up series. Samuel Badree (more on him below) provides the backup spin option, but he’ll likely open the bowling with one of the quicks. Dwayne Bravo often takes wickets in t20, and can obviously swing the blade as well, but his strength is as a wicket-taker and not as an economic bowler, the absence of which is a real problem. Kieron Pollard’s injury is also a nuisance but West Indies will hope they can cover him with improved performances from Bravo and Sammy.

One to watch – Samuel Badree


Describing Samuel Badree as a leg-spinner seems unfair, as he doesn’t really turn the ball, or even give it that much chance to spin. Badree’s flat, slight turning leg spin is almost like a difficult to judge medium pacer, as he fires the ball in towards leg stump with virtually no flight. It doesn’t sound like much, but early on in powerplay it’s tough for a batter at the start of their innings to hit over the top against that type of bowling. West Indies will look for Badree to get his four overs in for under twenty, forcing sides to attack Narine.

5th Bangladesh

How they will wish they’d been drawn in the other group

Semi-Finals

Australia beat New Zealand

I fancy Australia to have too much here, for everything New Zealand do well Australia do slightly better. Johnson is a loss but the Aussies will win a high scoring game.

India beat Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka don’t quite have the batting to set India a decent target, and with Kohli and Dhoni, they have two elite finishers who can handle Malinga.

Final

India beat Australia

India’s spinners will get them home to win the crown over Australia, whose lack of a proven international spinner will come back to haunt them.

Player of the Tournament – Virat Kohli
Most Runs – Shane Watson
Most Wickets – Ravi Ashwin

Tuesday, 7 January 2014

6 Cricketers to Watch in 2014



After last year's mixed bag here are another six

George Dockrell


In 2013, Ireland had quite the year. The associate nations have a red ball tournament. Ireland won that. They had an ODI tournament. Ireland won that. There was the T20 qualifier. Ireland won that. Irish cricket is in a very good place at the minute, where they completely dominate the other associate nations, particularly in white ball cricket, where they can compete with the lesser nations. At the world T20 this year, they face Zimbabwe, UAE and the Netherlands. They should win that group at a canter, and when they do, they can give South Africa, England, New Zealand and Sri Lanka a hugely tough match.

Ireland’s main problem is their talent drain to England. Their current side is very good, but would be hugely improved by Boyd Rankin, and in particular, both the middle order batting and potential captaincy of Eoin Morgan (William Porterfield is a very good captain whose batting has suffered greatly because of it). The latest player they could lose could be Dockrell, a highly talented left-arm spinner with huge experience in the white ball formats. Still only 21, and likely to bowl his full quota in every game of the world t20 (for Ireland that should be eight games); Dockrell has a chance to put himself in the shop window, either for England, or for the IPL. England need a spinner, and they may be tempted to head to the Emerald Isle again.

Nic Maddinson


Following a similar path to David Warner, and with a similar style, Nic Maddinson is the latest hard hitting left hander to come from Australia. Now 22, Maddinson has impressed since his debut at 18 for New South Wales with his power hitting. Whilst the aggressive and often aerial style are reminiscent of Warner, his stature is more that of Chris Gayle, if much less solidly built. Maddinson forte was T20 cricket, but many in Australia are impressed with his willingness to learn, shown by some excellent performances in the last Australian summer.

Maddinson was touted as a talent for the future, and made a strong impression on the Australian A tour before the Ashes series, where he was the highest run scorer. A T20 debut in India followed, but with Chris Rogers now 36, and Alex Doolan not in the white ball sides and therefore only able to make his case for a short period each year, if Maddinson can find a way into the white ball teams again, with a world T20 in April, it could be a very impressive and important year for him.

Tymal Mills


In a world of bigger bats, shorter boundaries, and greater freedom for batsman to play shots, the role of the true fast bowler has been threatened. The quicker they are, the faster they go. With Brett Lee and Shoaib Akhtar retiring, and Shaun Tait playing T20 only, it appeared true fast bowling might die. Fortunately, the performances of Mitchell Johnson this year, not just in his headline catching Ashes series, but also in his excellent performances in the IPL, have shown that fast bowling is not dead.

Tymal Mills bowls fast. He does not bowl accurately; he doesn’t swing it and doesn’t possess the canny nuances of a seasoned paceman. He simply runs in, and fires the ball at the batsman as quickly as possible. Bought onto the Ashes tour to give England practice against left-arm pace, Mills impressed all onlookers, particularly the Australian media set, with his natural pace. Tim Bresnan can master both swing and reverse swing, and he may get on top of a particular batsman. But medium and slow medium bowlers will never scare an entire side, as Johnson has done in this Ashes, and there is no terror in a batsman’s mind like knowing the bowler is simply too quick. England face Sri Lanka (destroyed by Johnson last winter) and India this summer, two nations not renowned for their ability to play hostile, short pitched bowling. In ODI’s England may well advised to unleash Mills.

Sam Robson


Nick Compton, Joe Root and now Michael Carberry have all opened for England in 2013. Compton failed as he became completely introverted (not to mention the growing concerns about his role within the dressing room). Root was moved down the order after himself and Alistair Cook were unable to form a working opening partnership, one of them continually falling early, and now Carberry and Cook have suffered exactly the same problem. All three struggled to rotate the strike and score, and all failed to form a relationship with Cook.

The next opening bat off the rank appears to be Sam Robson. Born and raised in Australia, Robson possesses an iron clad technique and has shown an ability to bat for long period of time. He’s England qualified through his parents, and throughout his early professional career was the subject of the affections of both the ECB and CA to declare for them. Robson chose not to declare for either country until he had qualified for both, before choosing to tour Australia with England Lions this winter. Technically sound, hugely mentally rated by all who have worked with him, it may be Robson’s turn this summer.

Natalie Sciver


The one bright spark in this men’s Ashes series has been the emergence of Ben Stokes, a hugely promising all-rounder with match winning potential with both bat and ball. England women found their version in the summer in the shape of Tokyo-born Surrey all-rounder Natalie Sciver, who looks the best prospect in English women’s cricket since Sarah Taylor.

Sciver has been highly rated from a young age, but concerns over her fitness left her on the outside looking in during 2012. Going through the England Academy eased those concerns, and Sciver’s rise in 2013 has been meteoric. In February 2013 she was England’s standby player for the World Cup. Come June she made her debut against Pakistan, winning player of the match in her second game. Selected in the Ashes squad, she wasn’t selected for either the Test or the first ODI, which England drew, then lost. She played the next five games, all of which England won. In October she took England’s first ever T20 hat-trick, impressing with both bat and ball in a tri-series in West Indies. She fulfils the role of batting six and bowling sixth that England need, combining with Jenny Gunn to give England two genuine all-rounders.

The careers of Sciver and Stokes can well be compared. Both 21, both hugely talented and appreciated as such from a young age, both held back by non-cricket problems (although being a bit chubby is probably a lesser crime than Stokes’ drink driving) and both now heavily involved in England cricket, they both have the potential to win a number of games for England in the next decade.

Mohammed Shami


I have been watching cricket long enough to remember the last really good Indian quick bowler. Not Zaheer Khan, who despite being a very accomplished swing/seam bowler, was never a quick bowler with the skills they bring, such as bouncers and aggression. The last Indian quick bowler was Javagal Srinath, a highly skilled operator who took 236 Test wickets and 315 ODI wickets, often using methods alien to the current crop of Indian fast bowlers – pace, bounce and aggression.

Watching Mohammed Shami in his Test career so far has reminded me of Srinath. Ishant Sharma and Umesh Yadav are talented bowlers, but they often give the impression that they don’t know how to use the fast bowling skills they possess. Bouncers are bowled not with intent, but as a ball to be used to change lengths and get a dot ball. Shami bowls his bouncer with intent. He’s not as quick as Srinath was, but there is time to add muscle, to refine technique. India really struggled in England on their last tour due to the lack of anything approaching even an adequate seam bowler. Shami may surprise a few people this time around.

Six others worth a look – Corey J Anderson, Jamie Overton, Unmukt Chand, Monimul Haque, Chadd Sayers and Holly Ferling.